(PS) Al-Zaghari v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20242:24-cv-00283California2,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI, et al., No. 2:24-cv-00283-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER & FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. On May 24, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 13.) Upon review of the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), the Court concludes sua sponte that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case and recommends that it be dismissed without leave to amend. Accordingly, the Court further recommends the motion for preliminary injunction be denied as moot. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Plaintiffs proceed on their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Governor Gavin Newsom, Judge Susan Jakubowski, David Chernis, John Nibbelin, Mara Feiger, Louise Rogers, Vanessa Osuna, Davis Guest Home, Lonny Davis, and Rex Adamson, M.D. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.