DeMartini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY P. DEMARTINI, et al., No. 2:14-cv-02722-DJC-CKD

Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MICHAEL J. DEMARTINI, et al., 13 Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No.

489.) For the reasons set forth below, this Motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

A more detailed factual summary of this case can be found in the Court’s prior

order denying Defendants’ Motion to Set Aside Interlocutory Judgment on Partition

(“Motion to Set Aside”). (See Order (ECF No. 483).) As is relevant here, Defendants

filed the pending Motion for Reconsideration on April 2, 2024, asking the Court to reconsider its denial of the Motion to Set Aside because the Court misinterpreted the scope of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate to hold a new trial on Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim and Defendants’ breach of partnership and defamation counterclaims. (Mot. Reconsideration (ECF No. 489).) In the alternative,…