Trate

(HC) Winston v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20241:24-cv-00182California812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-0182 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DENYING PETITIONER’S

B.M. TRATE, MOTIONS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

Respondent. ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (Docs. 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 18) 17 LeAnthony T. Winston is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The magistrate judge found the Court lacks jurisdiction over the petition, through which Petitioner sought to invoke the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). The magistrate judge recommended the petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, the magistrate judge found Petitioner failed to show he was entitled to injunctive relief in this action, and recommended his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.