(PC) James v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:22-cv-02193-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (Doc. Nos. 48, 54, 61) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Ronald Eugene James is a county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 12, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motions to supplement the sixth amended complaint (Doc. Nos. 48, 51) be denied without prejudice because plaintiff did not follow the proper procedure for amending a complaint under Local Rule 220. (Doc. No. 61 at 2.) Specifically, plaintiff did not file a proposed seventh amended complaint that was complete in itself. (Id.) (citing Goodbar v. Paldara, No.…