Williams v. Yuba City
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-01750-JAM-CKD 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 YUBA CITY, et al., 10 Defendants.
12 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Yuba City, 13 Katheryn Danisan, D. Hauck, Enrique Jurado, Nico Mitchell, and 14 Spencer Koski’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss 15 Plaintiff Kyle Williams’ (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint 16 under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 17 Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss Pl.’s Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 26. 18 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ 19 motion.1
I. ALLEGATIONS AND BACKGROUND
21 The parties are intimately familiar with the allegations and 22 procedural background of this case, which were included in the 23 Court’s previous Order on Defendant’s motion to dismiss 24 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC Order”). See FAC 25 Order, ECF No. 22. The first and second amended complaints are 26 27…