Braden
Braden v. Fresno County Sheriff's Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
BACKGROUND
20 Cory Lee Braden (“Plaintiff”), a former pretrial detainee, proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On 22 August 23, 2023, a screening order issued finding Plaintiff had failed to state any cognizable 23 claims and granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF 24 No. 7.) On August 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) 25 On March 1, 2024, a second screening order issued finding Plaintiff failed to state a 26 cognizable claim and granting him one final opportunity to amend his complaint. (ECF No. 9.) 27 Plaintiff was ordered to file his amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) On March 15, 2024, the second screening order was returned as undeliverable by the United States Postal Service stating that Plaintiff was not in custody.1 II. LEGAL STANDARD Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 7 …