Guillen

Guillen v. Schleicher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20241:23-cv-01722California4,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL MATTHEW GUILLEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01722-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT 12 v. (ECF No. 1) 13 TYLER SCHLEICHER, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 14 Defendants. 15

Gabriel Matthew Guillen (Plaintiff), a detainee at the Bob Wiley Detention Facility proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action on December 15, 2023. Plaintiff alleges claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Bakersfield Police Department Officers Tyler Schleicher, Edgar Galdamez, and Jaime Orozco (collectively, “Defendant Officers”). Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by individuals who are proceeding in forma pauperis. See Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.