Al-Dailam

Al-Dailam v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20241:24-cv-00108California1,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAMOUD ALI ALI AL-DAILAM, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00108-JLT-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH

FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS

v. AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. ORDER ADVANCING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

17 30-day Deadline

Pending before the Court is the motion to quash for insufficient service of process by Defendants Antony Blinken, the Embassy of the United States of Djibouti, and the United States Department of State (“Defendants”), the opposition of Plaintiffs Hamoud Ali Ali Al-Dailam, and Omar Hamoud Ali Al-Dailam (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants’ reply. (Docs. 8, 13, 15). On May 15, 2024, the Honorable District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston referred the pending motion to the undersigned for appropriate disposition. (Doc. 11). For the foregoing reasons, the Undersigned will grant Defendants’ motion to quash for insufficient process.1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.