Coleman

(UD)(PS) Fang v. Coleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20242:24-cv-01579California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Xiaoyan Fan, No. 2:24-cv-01579-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Jacqueline Coleman, 1S Defendant. 16 Defendant Jacqueline Coleman removed this unlawful detainer action from Sacramento County Superior Court. Removal Notice, ECF No. 1. Coleman also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Mot., ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the court remands the case to 20 the Sacramento Superior Court and denies as moot the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. I. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION A. Legal Standard When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is 24 initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 25 There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal question 26 jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and (2) diversity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.