Cavazos

Cavazos v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20241:23-cv-00859California4,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo – SBN 144074 2 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com Eric Valenzuela – SBN 284500 3 evalenzuela@galipolaw.com 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118

Attorneys for Plaintiff Loida Cavazos

PRENTICE LONG, PC Margaret E. Long – SBN 227176 Caitlin Smith – SBN 269716 2240 Court Street 10 Redding, CA 96001 Telephone: (530) 691-0800 Facsimile: (530) 691-0700 E-Mail: margaret@prenticelongpc.com caitlin@prenticelongpc.com 13 Attorneys for Defendant County of Fresno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

17 18 LOIDA CAVAZOS, No. 1:23-CV-00859-JLT-BAM

Plaintiff,

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

v. [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER COUNTY OF FRESNO; EMILO REYES; and DOES 2-10, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 27 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 28 disclosure and from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.