(PC) Van Huisen v. Chief of Staff
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:23-cv-02815-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. PLAINTIFF’S OUTSTANDING MOTIONS
BE DENIED AS MOOT AND THAT THE
CHIEF OF STAFF, CLERK OF COURT BE DIRECTED TO
CLOSE THIS MATTER
Defendant.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Van Huisen v. DeSantis, No. 2:23-cv-01758-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Van Huisen v. Clinton Administration, No. 2:23-cv-01596-DJC-KJN (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Van Husisen v. Joseph R. Biden, No. 2:23-cv-00944-DJC- EFB (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim). Accordingly, on March 5, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. …