(PC) Van Huisen v. Chief of Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20242:23-cv-02815California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:23-cv-02815-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. PLAINTIFF’S OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

BE DENIED AS MOOT AND THAT THE

CHIEF OF STAFF, CLERK OF COURT BE DIRECTED TO

CLOSE THIS MATTER

Defendant.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Van Huisen v. DeSantis, No. 2:23-cv-01758-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Van Huisen v. Clinton Administration, No. 2:23-cv-01596-DJC-KJN (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Van Husisen v. Joseph R. Biden, No. 2:23-cv-00944-DJC- EFB (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim). Accordingly, on March 5, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.