Baughman

(PC) Goods v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20242:23-cv-02790California2,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY GOODS, No. 2:23-cv-2790 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court recommends the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in December 2023. On March 5, 2024, this court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and, on screening the complaint, found that this action may be untimely. This court ordered plaintiff to address the question of the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 7.) In his May 16 response, plaintiff alleges facts that appear to demonstrate he has complied with the statute of limitations. Accordingly, this court will screen plaintiff’s complaint on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.