Dozier

Dozier v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20241:23-cv-00736California3,683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE DOZIER, No. 1:23-cv-00736 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HARNAM SINGH, individually and as Trustee of the Harnam and Amarjit Singh 2006 Trust dated, February 3, 2006, et al., Defendants. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 19. This motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(19). The matter was set to be heard on the papers. ECF No. 20. Defendants did not file an opposition or take any action in this case. For the reasons stated below, the court recommends that plaintiff’s motion be granted. I. Relevant Background As stated in his complaint, plaintiff is an 80-year-old person with physical disabilities, including limited ability to walk; he requires the use of a ride-on scooter daily. ECF No. 1 at 1-3. Defendants Harnam Singh and Amarjit Singh are alleged to be natural persons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.