Castro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD JAY WILSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00542-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

v. DIRECTING CLERK TO PROVIDE

COURTESY COPY OF COMPLAINT

J. CASTRO, (Doc. No. 17) Defendant.

JULY 8, 2024 DEADLINE 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Plaintiff’s Declaration in Support of Reconsideration Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) As to the Court’s Order to Striking [sic] Improper Pleading.” (Doc. No. 17). The Court construes the pleading as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motion. On May 9, 2024, the Court struck Plaintiff’s Complaint because it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (See Doc. No. 16). On May 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion, disputing that his Complaint contained more than 50 pages and…