Eslick

(PC) Nuno v. Eslick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20241:21-cv-00769California5,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 GUILLERMO NUNO, No. 1:21-cv-00769-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING

v. MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT D. ESLICK, et al. (ECF Nos. 81, 94) Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed February 16, 2024. I. RELEVANT HISTORY This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Eslick and Flores and retaliation claims against Defendants Satterfield and Flores. (ECF No. 21.) Defendants filed an answer to the original complaint on January 18, 2022. (ECF No. 30.) On January 26, 2022, the Court set the case for settlement conference on April 12, 2022. (ECF No. 31.) However, on March 22,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.