Deol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VIBRANTCARE REHABILITATION, No. 2:20-cv-00791-MCE-AC

INC.,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 13 KIRAN DEOL, et al. 14 Defendants.

16 By way of the present action, Plaintiff VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), 17 seeks damages from its former employee, Kiran Deol (“Deol”), and her subsequent 18 employers, Golden Bear Physical Therapy Sports Injury Center, Inc., and Golden Bear 19 PT Partners, LLC, (together, “Golden Bear”) (collectively with Deol, “Defendants”) 20 stemming from Defendant’s conduct at or around the end of her employment with 21 Plaintiff. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order with 22 Leave to Amend Complaint. ECF No. 78. For the following reasons, that Motion is

DENIED.

24 Generally, a motion to amend is subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a),2

26 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. See E.D. Cal. Local R. 230(g).

2 All further references to “Rule” or…