(PS) Miller v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20242:22-cv-02113California233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Alan Miller, No. 2:22-cv-02113-KJM-AC PS Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 1S Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Alan Miller requests this court revoke his appeal and refund the duplicate fee he submitted. See Request, ECF No. 46. The court responds to these requests in turn. First, under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the district court can dismiss an 20 appeal under certain circumstances before the appeal has been docketed by the circuit clerk. Fed. R. App. P. 42(a). Here, plaintiffs appeal has been docketed. Miller v. Tahoe Reg’l Plan. Agency, No. 22-02113, 2024 WL 1742135 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024), appeal docketed, No. 24-3535 (9th Cir. June 5, 2024). Therefore, plaintiff must file the appropriate dismissal documents with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Second, plaintiffs request for the court to refund…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.