(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20242:24-cv-01585California1,192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:24-cv-1585 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a pretrial detainee being held in the Sacramento County Superior Court pending trial. Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but in light of the recommended dismissal of this action, his request to proceed in forma pauperis should also be denied. As discussed below, this action should be dismissed. Plaintiff’s “Petition” Plaintiff’s initial filing was written on a form entitled “Petition for a Writ of Mandate,” but plaintiff crossed out “mandate” and wrote “certiorari.” (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Above that, plaintiff wrote “request to stay superior court proceedings.” (Id.) Plaintiff lists his two criminal cases pending in the Sacramento County Superior Court, both of which are set for trial on July 22, 2024: People v. Ronald Eugene James, Nos. 19FE014992 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.