Diaz

(PC) Evans v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20241:22-cv-00291California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DAVID ARKEEM EVANS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00291-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE DIAZ, et al., (ECF No. 63) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 11 Plaintiff David Arkeem Evans (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants E. Diaz and Ramirez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for spraying Plaintiff with OC spray; (2) Defendant Reed for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for ramming Plaintiff with his riot shield and pinning Plaintiff to a desk; (3) Defendants E. Diaz and Ramirez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for applying excessively tight ankle restraints and dragging Plaintiff by the chain of the shackles into the hallway;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.