Wellpath

(PC) Donley v. Wellpath

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20241:23-cv-01740California1,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN ARLIN DONLEY, No. 1:23-cv-01740-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF

WELLPATH, et al., THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY OF INTENT TO

Defendants. PROCEED ON CLAIM FOUND TO BE

COGNIZABLE

16 (ECF Nos. 10, 17)

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on December 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On February 26, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Dr. Gustavian, Medina, Debbie, Eva, Michelle, Maria, Chloe, Alejandra, Victoria, Libby, and Jane Doe. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.