(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20241:22-cv-00160California1,863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, No. 1:22-cv-00160-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE

v. COURT’S ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED

O. VALLADOLID, et al., WITNESSES AT TRIAL Defendants. (ECF No. 98) 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for jury trial on August 13, 2024, and a settlement conference is scheduled for June 18, 2024. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 1, 2024, order denying his motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 98.) Defendants filed an opposition on June 5, 2024. (ECF No. 106.) I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.