Berdnik

Berdnik v. Main Stream Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20242:23-cv-01928California4,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VYACHESLAV BERDNIK, Case No. 2:23-cv-1928-KJM-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. (ECF No. 16.) MAIN STREAM SOLUTIONS, INC. et al., 15 Defendant. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 16), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarifications. First, the Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.