Escamilla
Escamilla v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRANDON MIGUEL ESCAMILLA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00364-KES-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE STATE OF
v. CALIFORNIA AND CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., REHABILITATION AS PARTIES IN THIS
ACTION
Defendants. (ECF No. 12) 15 On June 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendants State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 11.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”). …