Wilson
Wilson v. Timec Services Co.,.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MARVONTE WILSON, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00172-WBS-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v. (ECF No 108.) TIMEC SERVICES COMPANY, INC. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 108), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. …