(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA HALOUSEK, Case No. 2:23-cv-839-KJM-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

PACER FEE EXEMPTION

v. (ECF No. 16.) CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Shiela Halousek asserts claims against Defendant California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) and “State of California Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General.”1 (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff requests the Court approve her request for exemption from fees for Public Access to Electronic Case Records (“PACER”). (ECF No. 16 (Pl. PACER Motion).) Plaintiff states she received a bill from the PACER administrator on October 13, 2023 for $51.70, for the quarter ending September 30, 2023. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff states she was previously granted an exemption from charges because of her First Amendment rights. (See id.) Plaintiff previously requested and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this case under 28 U.S.C.…