(PS) Lewis v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:23-cv-01010California10,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILO DANTE LEWIS, Case No. 2:23-cv-1010-CSK PS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND, AND DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTIONS TO DISMISS BEAR STEARNS RESIDENTIAL (ECF Nos. 44, 50, 52, 73.) MORTGAGE CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Milo Dante Lewis asserts claims in his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) concerning a residential mortgage against Defendants Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corp., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Community Loan Servicing LLC f/k/a Bayview Loan Servicing LLC, Bayview Asset Management LLC, Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, MTC Financial Inc. d/b/a Trustee Corps, Quality Loan Service Corp., Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, and Suzette Wurz.1 (ECF No. 43.) Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to remand to state court and motions to dismiss by JP Morgan Chase and Bear Sterns (the “Chase Defendants”), Trustee Corps, and Quality Loan Service. (ECF Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.