(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:22-cv-01761California2,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, No. 2:22-cv-01761-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER TRI-COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Pro Se Plaintiff Mary Love’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Stay this Court’s Judgment pending appeal. (ECF No. 44.) Defendant Tri-Counties Bank (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 46.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for the disposition of Plaintiff’s motion. In short, Plaintiff alleged Defendant maintained and reported to financial institutions inaccurate financial information about Plaintiff in connection with a mortgage Defendant secured against Plaintiff’s home. (ECF No. 1 at 2.) According to Plaintiff, Defendant forgave the loan but continues to try to collect on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.