(PC) Salazar v. Fresno County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20241:24-cv-00167California3,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTIN SALAZAR, Case No. 1:24-cv-00167-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS1

v. (Doc. No. 12) FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. 16 On April 30, 2024, the Court issued a Findings and Recommendations to dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Court’s March 20, 2024 Screening Order or file an first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 10, “F&R”). Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Objection to Magistrate Judges Findings and Recommendations” accompanied by a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12). Liberally construed, the Court interprets the pleading as seeking an extension of time to respond to the March 20, 2024 Screening Order. Accordingly, the Court grants the construed extension of time and will screen Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Upon review, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss the First 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.