Mohmand

(PC) Newsome v. Mohmand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:23-cv-00151California274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, No. 2:23-cv-0151 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. MOHMAND, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that this matter be consolidated with Garcia v. Mohmand, 2:22-cv-2159 TLN DMC. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) permits a court to consolidate actions involving common questions of law or fact. In determining whether to consolidate actions, the court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation. Southwest Marine, Inc., v. Triple A. Mach. Shop, Inc., 720 F. Supp. 805, 807 (N.D. Cal. 1989). It does appear that there are at least some common issues of fact with respect to this case and the case identified by plaintiff. However, the common issues are not so substantial as to warrant consolidation. The court notes that there is only one defendant remaining in this action and fourteen remain in the Garcia…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.