Barragas
(PC) Cunningham v. Barragas
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20241:24-cv-00041California3,993 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:24-cv-00041-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION BARRAGAS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 9) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff L. C. Cunningham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) The Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended…