Sandoval

(PC) Wright v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20241:22-cv-01082California877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01082-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

v. September 12, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. SANDOVAL,

Defendant.

16 17 Plaintiff Keith Jerome Wright is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following Defendant Sandoval’s expression of 19 interest in pursuing an early settlement conference (Doc. 21), the Court has determined that this 20 case will benefit from a settlement conference.1 Therefore, this case was referred to Magistrate 21 Judge Erica P. Grosjean to conduct a settlement conference, which is hereby scheduled for 22 September 12, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. 23 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 24 1. A settlement conference is scheduled to occur on September 12, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., 25 before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The conference shall be conducted via 26 Zoom videoconference and shall last up to three hours. 27 1 The Court notes the parties have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.