Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 On December 8, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 56.) The hearing of plaintiff’s motion was continued several times. (ECF Nos. 62, 131, 175.) On May 31, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Statement re: Discovery Disagreement. (ECF No. 190.) On June 7, 2024, the motion came for hearing before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 193.) Attorneys Rachel June-Graber and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. After hearing oral argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. Having considered the parties’ briefing and oral argument, for the reasons stated below and at the June 7, 2024 hearing, the undersigned orders as follows.
1 Also heard on June 7, 2024, was…