The Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Precision Fiber Optics, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20242:24-cv-00831California3,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY No. 2:24-cv-00831-DAD-CKD

COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 PRECISION FIBER OPTICS, INC., et al., (Doc. No. 8) 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on defendants Precision Fiber Optics, Inc. (“PFO”) and Joseph Custer’s motion to dismiss filed on April 11, 2024. (Doc. No. 8.) On April 16, 2024, the motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230. (Doc. No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the pending motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND On March 18, 2024, plaintiff The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (“plaintiff Travelers”) filed its complaint in this action. (Doc. No. 1.) In its complaint, plaintiff Travelers alleges as follows. Next Phase Construction, Inc. (“NPC”) filed a separate lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court in 2023, Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.