Randle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND RANDLE, No. 2:23-cv-01990-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF COLUSA, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Williams’s (“the City”)1 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative for Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff Raymond Randle (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) The City did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the City’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as premature, GRANTS the City’s Motion to Dismiss, and DENIES the City’s Motion for More Definite Statement as moot. /// /// /// /// 27 The Court notes Defendant County of Colusa (“the County”) has not appeared in this action or filed a responsive pleading, nor is the County of Colusa party to the instant motions. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case…