Johnson v. Fresno Sports and Events LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20241:24-cv-00352California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNSON CHRISTINE, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00352-KES-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT

v. FRESNO SPORTS AND EVENTS

PARTNERS LLC A AS A PARTY IN THIS

FRESNO SPORTS AND EVENTS LLC, et ACTION al., (ECF No. 5) Defendants. 16 17 On June 11, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant Fresno Sports and Events Partners LLC without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 5.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)). Defendant Fresno Sports and Events Partners LLC has not filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.