Vincent
(PC) Mallett v. Vincent
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWANE ARTHUR MALLETT, No. 2:23-cv-00394-DAD-DMC (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING
JOHN K. VINCENT, et al., THIS ACTION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 9) 16 Plaintiff Dawane Arthur Mallett, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) on March 2, 2023. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 15, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without leave to amend, due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 9.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of service. …