Bell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA, No. 2:12-cv-02499-DJC-CKD individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
employees pursuant to the Private RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR ORDER Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL
15 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BUT GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a 18 Delaware corporation; JOHN BROOKS, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 This Court previously granted the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”) and John Brooks (“Brooks”) (together, “Defendants”), which sought to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claim for violations of California Labor Code section 203 because Home Depot had a “good- faith dispute” whether any wages were due, arguing that…