Bell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:12-cv-02499California5,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA, No. 2:12-cv-02499-DJC-CKD individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

employees pursuant to the Private RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR ORDER Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL

15 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BUT GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a 18 Delaware corporation; JOHN BROOKS, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 This Court previously granted the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”) and John Brooks (“Brooks”) (together, “Defendants”), which sought to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claim for violations of California Labor Code section 203 because Home Depot had a “good- faith dispute” whether any wages were due, arguing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.