(PS) Claire v. County of Sutter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20242:22-cv-00780California309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROUBLE P. CLAIRE, an individual, No. 2:22-cv-00780-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER SARA M. HOLLIS, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Discovery Sanctions. (ECF No. 46.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 4, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 50.) The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.