Blink

Blink v. Kern High School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20241:23-cv-00531California1,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

M.H., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No. 1:23-cv-00531-KES-CDB TIFFANY ARTERBERRY, et al., ORDER VACATING ALL CASE Plaintiffs, MANAGEMENT DATES 13 v. (Doc. 38) 14 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO Defendants. 41(a)(2) AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b)

FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

AND COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

14-DAY DEADLINE

19 Clerk of the Court to Effect Service By Mail 20

Plaintiffs Arionna Blink and M.H (now proceeding through M.H.’s guardian ad litem, Tiffany Arterberry), commenced this action with the filing of a complaint on April 4, 2023, asserting causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Kern High School District, Mark Calvillo, and since-dismissed Defendant East Bakersfield High School. (Docs. 1, 21, 23).1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.