Blink
Blink v. Kern High School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
M.H., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No. 1:23-cv-00531-KES-CDB TIFFANY ARTERBERRY, et al., ORDER VACATING ALL CASE Plaintiffs, MANAGEMENT DATES 13 v. (Doc. 38) 14 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO Defendants. 41(a)(2) AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b)
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
AND COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
14-DAY DEADLINE
19 Clerk of the Court to Effect Service By Mail 20
Plaintiffs Arionna Blink and M.H (now proceeding through M.H.’s guardian ad litem, Tiffany Arterberry), commenced this action with the filing of a complaint on April 4, 2023, asserting causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Kern High School District, Mark Calvillo, and since-dismissed Defendant East Bakersfield High School. (Docs. 1, 21, 23).1 …