Lundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIO ANGEL TORREZ, JR., Case No. 1:24-cv-00362-SKO (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. [Doc. 15] L. LUNDY, Warden, Respondent.

16 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Court dismissed the petition and entered judgment on June 11, 2024. Given the case is now closed, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2024 /s/…