Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALVADOR GARCIA JR., Case No. 2:23-cv-0899-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 27) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 18 || 27), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 20 clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that 22 action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 24 jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 25 …