(PC) Overton v. Warden CHCF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20242:24-cv-01274California308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:24-cv-01274 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN CHCF, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed May 7, 2024, plaintiff was granted thirty days to pay the filing fee or file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the May 7, 2024 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.