Goff

(PC) Coleman v. Goff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20242:24-cv-00575California2,282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW JAMES COLEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-0575 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALEXANDER GOFF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant plaintiff’s IFP motion, dismiss the complaint, and give plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.