Hunter

(PC) Ainsworth v. Hunter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20242:24-cv-01347California1,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRELL AINSWORTH, No. 2:24-cv-1347 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. HUNTER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 29, 2024, this Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) Pending before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons stated herein, this Court recommends that this action be dismissed. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.