Gates

(PC) Walker v. Gates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20242:20-cv-02338California1,792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G. DANIEL WALKER, No. 2:20-CV-02338-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. GATES, et al., and Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to Title II of the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794. On November 23, 2020, Defendants State of California, D. Bright, N. Malakka, A. Adams, R. Burton, A. Abdulgader, S. Gates, and R. Kumar D. Cueva, L. Austin, and D. Mathis filed a notice of removal, and the action was removed within thirty days of service on the last- served Defendant, as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). See ECF No. 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 123, Defendants submitted a notice of related cases contained therein notifying the Court that Plaintiff had filed a related action in Sacramento Superior Court. See ECF No. 1, pg. 4.1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.