Wright

(PS) Malik v. Wright

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20242:24-cv-00692California1,264 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GHAUS MALIK, No. 2:24-cv-00692 TLN AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT W. WRIGHT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this matter pro se; pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 16. The undersigned recommends this case be DISMISSED in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as explained below. I. Background A. The Complaint Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of California. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff is suing four defendants: (1) Robert W. Wright, a citizen of California, (2) Walid Tamri, a citizen of Illinois, (3) Margaret E. White, a citizen of New York, and (4) Haig Panossian, a citizen of New Jersey. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.