Newsom

(PC) Lawrence v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20242:22-cv-01975California1,545 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RISHARDO LAWRENCE, No. 2:22-CV-1975-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. See ECF No. 26. The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction. See Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365 (2008)). To the extent prior Ninth Circuit cases suggest a lesser standard by focusing solely on the possibility of irreparable harm, such cases are “no longer controlling, or even viable.” Am.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.