Escobedo

Escobedo v. Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20241:24-cv-00373California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ESCOBEDO, No. 1:24-cv-00373-KES-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

NICOLE SOLANO dba Chalio’s Fresno, et al., (Doc. 9) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jose Escobedo seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, California’s Unruh Act, and California Health and Safety Code §§ 19955, 19959. See Doc. 1. Following an order to show cause regarding jurisdiction, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims and dismiss them without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). Doc. 9. The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff on April 15, 2024, and provide that any objections must be filed within 14 days of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.