Hamman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KEVIN LAMAR PORTER, No. 1:23-cv-01468-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

BE DENIED

VIVIAN HAMMAN, et al. (ECF No. 34) Defendants. 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed June 17, 2024. I. DISCUSSION A temporary restraining order preserves the status quo and prevents irreparable harm until a hearing can be held on a preliminary injunction application. See Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974). A temporary restraining order is an “extraordinary remedy” that a court should award only when a plaintiff makes a clear showing that he is entitled to such relief.…