Tapia

Order 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING SOLOMON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01604-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMPROPER PLEADING v. (Doc. No. 35) TAPIA, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED

Defendant. DEFENDANT (Doc. No. 18) 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Response to Exhaustion Motion,” filed June 17, 2024. (Doc. No. 35, “Response”). In his pleading, Plaintiff describes in detail his efforts to exhaust his administrative remedies through the CDCR grievance process. (See id. at 1- 5). Plaintiff also attaches 13 pages of exhibits to his pleading. (Id. at 6-18). Plaintiff’s Response is an improper pleading, and the Court will order the Clerk of Court to strike it from the record. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure designate proper pleadings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(1)- (7). Further, Local Rule 230(l) sets forth the…